eisbaw 3 hours ago

the tricky bit is ensuring your inaccurate plain english statement is captured and formalized correctly as lean.

owlbite 3 hours ago

Interesting, but I don't see any licensing terms, which means I can't touch it in a commercial setting.

  • jrflo an hour ago

    What commercial setting do you want to use a Lean theorem-proving agent in?

  • a2ff6eeb0 2 hours ago

    It's AI generated, so licensing terms are unenforceable.

philipfweiss 2 hours ago

Maybe consider an integration with theoremdb.org?

  • fractorial an hour ago

    To be clear, I am deep into auto-research, but hooking up slop to slop is just unlikely to produce anything valuable.

    Value is in how maths is communicated: The process, frustrations, triumphs, etc.

    We have to able to take generated formalizations from “it compiles” to “it is correct” before crystallizing them.

homarp 5 hours ago

A terminal AI coding assistant with a built-in math formalization engine — describe a problem in plain language and it converts it into a Lean 4 theorem and attempts a formal proof.

129387 4 hours ago

[dead]

  • eisbaw 3 hours ago

    git clone is slightly faster

    • gumby 3 hours ago

      And doesn’t use as many tokens, at least for now.

      • black_knight an hour ago

        I just replaced git clone with a script which fetches the README.md and sets of a fleet of agents to do a cleanroom reimplementation.

        Lets me ignore the LICENSE.md file, and use how I want.