Acid3 is 100 tests but to have a browser that works on any real percentage of the internet you need to pass the over 52000 tests and nearly two million subtests [1] that make up the Web Platform Tests [2]
This is like the difference between a college degree and passing a spelling test.
Modern browsers should no longer score 100 on Acid 3 though.
>By April 2017, the updated specifications had diverged from the test such that the latest versions of Google Chrome, Safari and Mozilla Firefox no longer pass the test as written
Yes, but considering the goal of his project is a proof of concept, that is, proving this project is possible, acid3 is a good place to start to prove the worth of the project and aiming 100% first make more sense. Tweaks will be needed one way or another to make it equivalent to the big 3.
For a piece of software designed by reading the specs and implementing accordingly, there acid3 would be a good way of demonstrating the quality of the result.
But is that what happened? If you pass tests that conflict with the specs, then that implies that the implementation is not based on specs, but on feedback from the test. Which means it may be designed to pass the test, and not much good once you go outside the test examples.
I'll extend the benefit of the doubt and say that it's possible that the implementation is based on an older version of specs, one that matches the tests. But it doesn't inspire confidence that all we're shown is a single screenshot and no source code.
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/commits/master/aci... shows the history of the web-platform-tests copy of WPT, which has mostly followed Hixie’s earlier updates to Acid3 by simply commenting out assertions that no longer match what specs say.
Congrats! Even if this is vibecoded, this is a hard task to get just a barebones renderer working.
I do concur with the few other folks here that the ShowHN is meant for actually showcasing something rather than the landing page with a screenshot. I would expect it to link to a downloadable binary or the source.
Showcasing Web Platform Tests coverage would be better than just Acid 3.
For anyone else wondering why this is hard: I'm writing a browser engine that renders to png. I dug into the source code of other browser engines and came across scenarios that I had never imagined. I learnt about font rasterization, execution contexts for scripts, etc. There's a tonne of stuff to be learnt by building something like this.
Supporting iframes and each group of the web platform APIs, each add another layer of complexity that I definitely dont want to be tackling as a solo dev.
Your own engine?! Wow, that's incredible. Is this gonna be like Servo where people can build a browser around this, or will it be a standalone browser?
I recently switched from Arc to Helium but it's still Chrome with different paint. When I was using Opera 12, it was the most standards-compliant browser so it became my main. What are the goals for cwbrowser (and is the name permanent)?
For reference, Safari is doing around 53, and Chrome is around 60 for M5, of which they were bragging about [0]. So curious to see whether there's any gains from your custom browser.
The render of the HN page looks close at first glance, but the engine clearly does not support SVG yet - those tiny arrows are all missing. Also it renders "Hacker News" on the header garbled with overlapping texts so it seems that the text-shaping engine lacks a proper inline box model. I would also be interested in seeing renders of more modern pages.
Very cool and I wish you the best of luck (I genuinely hate this generation browsers) - but my experience with bun and other complex zig tools is that a segfault always awaits behind the corner
I was wondering if you could add a Acid2 rendering screenshot to the site, please? It tests some different things than Acid3, so I'm curious how it fares.
i'm assuming this is written with LLMs given the writing on that page and the nature of the other "products" on that website. i would not call that hand-written, as the page does in the second paragraph
I did use LLM for the landing page since I don't have much time on it. The browser however not that much. I did use claude and my own cwcode to help developing this, but a lot of times the zig code had to be written by hand. Hope this answered your question.
Cursor was lambasted from the start because they wrote blog posts about writing a browner “from scratch in rust” but it was neither without dependencies nor actually worked.
It was not serious engineering. It was a side project experiment with yeeting tokens into the sun.
If you're going to "Show HN" you should show something. This just a hastily-extruded [1] landing page with no details.
Also, using an agentic framework and writing code by hand "a lot of the time" does not count as "from scratch".
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49129191
Working with it for 2 years is impressive nevertheless.
Working with an agentic framework for more than a week make me want to throw it over the cliff
It’s from scratch not by scratch
a distinction without a difference
sure, no difference between "what" and "how"
Acid3 is 100 tests but to have a browser that works on any real percentage of the internet you need to pass the over 52000 tests and nearly two million subtests [1] that make up the Web Platform Tests [2]
This is like the difference between a college degree and passing a spelling test.
1. https://servo.org/blog/2023/07/20/servo-web-platform-tests/ 2. https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt
Not to mention this site is clearly vibe coded and has a vague call to action and no source code available thus indicating possible vaporware.
Modern browsers should no longer score 100 on Acid 3 though.
>By April 2017, the updated specifications had diverged from the test such that the latest versions of Google Chrome, Safari and Mozilla Firefox no longer pass the test as written
Yes, but considering the goal of his project is a proof of concept, that is, proving this project is possible, acid3 is a good place to start to prove the worth of the project and aiming 100% first make more sense. Tweaks will be needed one way or another to make it equivalent to the big 3.
For a piece of software designed by reading the specs and implementing accordingly, there acid3 would be a good way of demonstrating the quality of the result.
But is that what happened? If you pass tests that conflict with the specs, then that implies that the implementation is not based on specs, but on feedback from the test. Which means it may be designed to pass the test, and not much good once you go outside the test examples.
I'll extend the benefit of the doubt and say that it's possible that the implementation is based on an older version of specs, one that matches the tests. But it doesn't inspire confidence that all we're shown is a single screenshot and no source code.
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/commits/master/aci... shows the history of the web-platform-tests copy of WPT, which has mostly followed Hixie’s earlier updates to Acid3 by simply commenting out assertions that no longer match what specs say.
Exactly. It's meaningless now and I stopped looking at it a few years before 2017 when I ran a Web dev shop
hmm. i wonder if any of the stuff they have changed since then is stuff i could legitimate not do without in a browser
Aha, I'm getting 97/100 on Safari
96/100 with Brave on Android
[dead]
Faster than chrome and 100% clearance of acid3 is certainly interesting, and a great achievement for a solo dev, good job!
I’d love to see something entirely FOSS dethrone the big corp browsers, hope that’s the goal here.
Is this open source? May be being blind but cannae find the source anywhere
Firefox already exists, and for all its flaws it is both free and open source.
Congrats! Even if this is vibecoded, this is a hard task to get just a barebones renderer working.
I do concur with the few other folks here that the ShowHN is meant for actually showcasing something rather than the landing page with a screenshot. I would expect it to link to a downloadable binary or the source.
Showcasing Web Platform Tests coverage would be better than just Acid 3.
For anyone else wondering why this is hard: I'm writing a browser engine that renders to png. I dug into the source code of other browser engines and came across scenarios that I had never imagined. I learnt about font rasterization, execution contexts for scripts, etc. There's a tonne of stuff to be learnt by building something like this.
Supporting iframes and each group of the web platform APIs, each add another layer of complexity that I definitely dont want to be tackling as a solo dev.
And don't forget Cloudflare will just ban you from the internet if it doesn't recognise you.
Your own engine?! Wow, that's incredible. Is this gonna be like Servo where people can build a browser around this, or will it be a standalone browser?
I recently switched from Arc to Helium but it's still Chrome with different paint. When I was using Opera 12, it was the most standards-compliant browser so it became my main. What are the goals for cwbrowser (and is the name permanent)?
Not a Show HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
What's the Speedometer 3.1 [0] rating for that browser paired with an M5?
[0]: https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/
For reference, Safari is doing around 53, and Chrome is around 60 for M5, of which they were bragging about [0]. So curious to see whether there's any gains from your custom browser.
[0]: https://blog.google/chromium/a-double-victory-for-web-speed-...
The render of the HN page looks close at first glance, but the engine clearly does not support SVG yet - those tiny arrows are all missing. Also it renders "Hacker News" on the header garbled with overlapping texts so it seems that the text-shaping engine lacks a proper inline box model. I would also be interested in seeing renders of more modern pages.
Very cool and I wish you the best of luck (I genuinely hate this generation browsers) - but my experience with bun and other complex zig tools is that a segfault always awaits behind the corner
I was wondering if you could add a Acid2 rendering screenshot to the site, please? It tests some different things than Acid3, so I'm curious how it fares.
I have a question: what are you planning to do with it? It is curiosity. Thanks and congratulations for the work
Huh, cool, let me know when it's available. I like trying out alternative browser engines every now and then.
i'm assuming this is written with LLMs given the writing on that page and the nature of the other "products" on that website. i would not call that hand-written, as the page does in the second paragraph
I did use LLM for the landing page since I don't have much time on it. The browser however not that much. I did use claude and my own cwcode to help developing this, but a lot of times the zig code had to be written by hand. Hope this answered your question.
this admittedly makes it even a harder sell to have so little (any?) source code available on github, gitlab, codeberg, whatever.
what's the deal with that? why is Google Drive zips your main distribution method, with no source available?
and finally: are you going to change this?
Nice. Will you also release a version without Javascript (and without css)?
Awesome work! Can't wait for it to land.
What license will you release under?
What's the goal? Did you learn anything interesting?
Hello, how does cwbrowser compare with Lightpanda?
This should be downloadable.
how much of it was vibe coded?
Super cool! Any plans to release it for Linux? Would love to test it but I have no Mac unfortunately
closed source?
This is cool! And as someone else who's been building their own browser engine: welcome to the club!
Do you have WPT tests results, and/or screenshots of it rendering real websites?
No source code, no binary, just a page with some claims about code that might even exist.
Eh.
The whole thing looks like a giant AI slop
[flagged]
[flagged]
Congrats. I’d love a very agent friendly browser by the way
In terms of engines, Fastrender, by cursor, is AI generated in rust. Don't know why no one's picked that up and run with it yet.
Cursor was lambasted from the start because they wrote blog posts about writing a browner “from scratch in rust” but it was neither without dependencies nor actually worked.
It was not serious engineering. It was a side project experiment with yeeting tokens into the sun.