jrgd 6 hours ago

The few tests i ran i just got Granite4.1 tell me about YOLO repeatedly for no reasons; every questions and prompts were answered with a mention of a vision system unrelated with the task…

  • SequoiaHope 5 hours ago

    I shudder to think of what IBM’s government based clients are using YOLO for.

    • jrgd 2 hours ago

      Or trying to… given the performance of this release.

      I bet though internal tools are more efficient.

    • jrgd 2 hours ago

      That thought now reminds me of the ibm accounting machines and their punch cards… Not a great perspective.

RickHull 5 hours ago

What is an enterprise workload?

  • Havoc 4 hours ago

    Aside from this just being standard corporate speak copy, there is an element of truth there - the granite models are likely to give you more plain toneless responses rather than a rainbow of emojiis. Which in corporate setting can be useful

    • skiing_crawling 3 hours ago

      That actually sounds nice in theory. A model for getting work done and nothing else, which doesn't have to account or be trained for any type of user engagement. Like how chatgpt/claude are wasting their capacity on social niceties and glazing the user. I don't know if granite is one such but I'd bet that many of the other popular models can't be since they are consumer facing.

    • weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago

      Existing models from OpenAI etc never return emojis when using the raw APIs unless you ask for it

  • reliablereason an hour ago

    Pragmatically enterprise tends to mean less refined, designed by committee and expensive.

    In this case i would guess it is mostly a justification for taking a part of the LLM pie.

  • swiftcoder 4 hours ago

    OCR'ing tables into spreadsheets, apparently

  • hbbio 3 hours ago

    "This approach presents a significant opportunity for optimization and strategic realignment to better meet our core objectives."

ekianjo 7 hours ago

The lmstudio link points to granite 4.0

immanuwell 2 hours ago

cool portfolio flex from IBM, but until I see independent benchmarks that aren't cherry-picked, I'll believe it when I see it