originalvichy 2 hours ago

I fear this is only the start of it. A minimum of 3-4 constellations more will probably be launched in the near future (Russia, China, EU).

Their obvious dual-use nature makes them tempting, and a military target if a large conflict will take place in the near future. I hope their lower orbit will help any space junk burn up fast.

ragebol 2 hours ago

Yeah, I kinda get why astronomers are not particularly happy with satellite constellations.

  • adev_ 31 minutes ago

    And this is just the visible spectrum.

    The situation is one order of magnitude worst in radio-astronomy.

    It is fair to state that satellite constellations will certainly be the main obstacle to multiple major scientific discoveries in the next decade.

    • ultratalk 21 minutes ago

      Opinion: We need to move our astronomical observation equipment off of Earth and onto other bodies, especially radio astronomy, which, unlike telescopes that operate in other wavelengths, is still affected by Earth's emissions in LEO/near-Earth space. We should put a radio telescope on the far side of the moon [0] to benefit from the thousands of kilometers of lunar material separating Earth's emissions from telescopes.

      [0] https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438165

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Crater_Radio_Telescope

      • christophilus 2 minutes ago

        Agreed. It’s the only solution short of a ban on constellations.

ciroduran 2 hours ago

I'm rebuilding my RSS feed collection, and having pretty astronomy pictures is a fine addition. Thanks!

khazhoux an hour ago

Is this all / mostly Starlink?

  • vednig 31 minutes ago

    It's a set of network satellites for sure either by Eutelsat or Starlink in 70:20 ratio 10% being other providers

    But all of them being LEO for sure.

w-ll 2 hours ago

if i could imagine what a Sophon from 3 body problem would look like. this is kind of it.

renerick 2 hours ago

That looks so cool, ngl!